Category Archives: NBA

Flopping and Flailing, the NBA’s Problem with Charging and Blocking

Earlier today we got a request on our Facebook page (that’s right, we have a Facebook page, and  we actually have some original conversations over there instead of just syndicating our blog posts to it) for some perspective on an article from SB Nation about flopping in basketball written by professional basketball player Dan Grunfeld. Grunfeld’s piece is titled, Why NBA Players Flop, And What The League Can Do About It. He essentially says that players flop because they’re able to get away with it. As far as what the league can do about it, he provides a number of options ranging from assessing technical fouls to permitting coaches to issue challenges to post game league reviews resulting in fines.

I look at ‘flopping’ somewhat differently. Yes, it’s done in basketball, but I don’t think it’s the pandemic that some make it out to be (I’m looking at you, Jeff Van Gundy). It definitely doesn’t even begin to approach the problem that soccer has with flopping. Those guys are just ridiculous. I feel like about 75% of the time there’s a charging or blocking foul in basketball it’s a legitimate play. Two competitive people getting after it and contact was made where someone fell down. I’m not saying there aren’t flops. There definitely are, but let’s not exaggerate (again, looking at you, Jeff Van Gundy).

Getting back to Grunfeld’s question – why do NBA players flop – I think it’s because they have to. Referees now favor the offensive player so much that the offensive charge is one of the few advantages they have left to play. Think about it. Traveling is so prevalent now that sometimes I feel like over the course of a game players take more steps holding the ball than they do dribbling it. Used to be that refs allowed two steps on a drive to the basket. Now it seems like they allow four or more. Double dribble. Players turn the ball over in their hands every time they dribble the ball now. It’s rarely called, but frequently occurs.

Most important to this particular topic, think about a player driving to the basket. Players are throwing their bodies into the lane and the defenders in their way. Just flailing their bodies, throwing the ball up and counting on getting a blocking foul called. Continuation calls make it even worse. Offensive players do it because they know they get the benefit of the call more often than not. Referees are much more inclined to call a blocking foul than a charge. I’ve seen this so many times this year in the playoffs that I can’t even count that high. Wade, LeBron, Westbrook, Pierce and more. They’re all doing it. So yeah, sometimes a defender will ‘flop’ to try and draw a foul. Why aren’t we criticizing those out of control players the same way we are those that flop? Seems a bit like a double standard to me. Dwyane Wade throwing his body into Brandon Bass and tossing the ball up behind his head is a smart play, but if Shane Battier slides in front of a driving, out of control Paul Pierce people think it’s a dirty or underhanded play? That’s just as smart of a play as Wade’s.

Look at the actual definition of charging and the sentiment behind the rule. It was instituted to keep offensive players in control. The NBA has a breakdown of charging and blocking rules here. You’ll notice there’s no mention of the defender needing to have both feet planted on the ground to draw a charge – a common misconception among fans, players, coaches and media. In this post based on information heard from the NBA’s director of officiating programs and development, it’s stated that referees actually watch a defender’s torso. So a defender actually can be moving when drawing a charge – as long as the torso is in a set defensive position. Before you ask, yes, that is possible.

To eliminate flopping, I think the NBA also needs to crack down on offensive players that are flailing and out of control. Why should someone get rewarded for blindly and wildly charging the lane? Better yet, why should a defender get penalized for attempting to defend that type of poor basketball play? If referees show they won’t allow this abuse of the rules, then defenders won’t feel the need to flop either.

Of course, the NBA would never allow this because it could cut down on the number of tomahawk jam ending drives down the lane. So we’ll have to deal with flailing. And flopping.

‘The Look’ and the Expectations It’s Set

Two days ago we witnessed one of the greatest playoff performances of all time. LeBron James single handedly beat the Boston Celtics. They couldn’t stop him. They couldn’t even contain him. He was able to do whatever he wanted and the most impressive part of the performance is that Boston was playing good defense. They were on him. Hands in his face, bodying him, staying with him step for step. And he was still burning them.

This was a LeBron I don’t think we’ve ever seen. He’s always been a great player, but we’ve never seen him as this unstoppable force. When he stepped foot on the court Thursday he was different. He had a different look to him – ‘The Look.’ The look on his face, which didn’t leave until about midway through the fourth quarter, was sullen, removed and pouty. (Side note: will we see this from him more? Will it rise to the level of The Manning Face?) I’ve seen some describe LeBron’s look Thursday night as emotionless. I didn’t see it as that. To me, it seemed more like an act. “I’m going to have this look on my face the whole game as a statement.” It struck me that way because you could see him make an effort to keep the look on his face. He’d drive the lane and get fouled, face contorting, as always players typically do in that situation. As soon as the whistle blew, you could see him consciously make the effort to put that look back on his face. To me, it didn’t seem emotionless, it seemed more pouty.

I don’t know if that was LeBron’s effort to look intense or if it was the result of being beaten down for the past two days by fans and media (didn’t help him that after Kevin Durant closed out San Antonio some were now saying he jumped past LeBron as best in the league and has undoubtedly been the best player in the playoffs). But either way, it didn’t strike me as genuine. Some players have an intense look to them that is transparent and honest. You can tell that they’re intense in all facets of their lives – Michael Jordan had that, Kobe has that, even Kevin Garnett has that look. LeBron never has. He’s a little more happy go lucky. Not to say he doesn’t take the game seriously – he does – but he likes to have fun while he’s playing. He’s never had that stone cold vibe to him like Michael or Kobe. And that’s fine. Everyone is their own man and succeeds in his own way. Magic Johnson didn’t strike me as being a stone cold killer either and he succeeded without it.

Now, if ‘the look’ was the result of two days of intense criticism and scrutiny, that seems more plausible than the sudden emergence of high intensity, but as I mentioned earlier, it was visible that there was effort to keep ‘the look.’ If it was a beaten down LeBron, he never would’ve come out of that mode and there were moments you could see he did.

Moving beyond the look on LeBron’s face, there was something more important about his performance Thursday night: now we’ve seen he can do it… After that game, I was asking, “where has this been before?” The guy’s always been great, but not dominating at such a high level. What happened? He destroyed one of the NBA’s best defensive teams. The rest of his team was flat and offered little help. Wade has been stymied and frustrated by Boston’s double teams the whole series and he didn’t have a good game. Bosh might as well have not been there. The cast of supporting players filled their roles, but did nothing spectacular. LeBron forced a game 7, the Heat didn’t.

He had some great games in Cleveland, some really great games. He led a cast of misfits to the NBA Finals, but I don’t recall seeing anything like Thursday night from him before. I’m trying to keep perspective and not get caught up in the moment, but I don’t ever recall being as impressed with LeBron as I was Thursday night. Had we seen this side of him before, we could be looking at him as the greatest player ever right now. Should he have broken out ‘the look’ before? Has he been coasting, somewhat wasting this insane amount of talent that emerged Thursday night which we haven’t seen anything like since Jordan? The answer is of course no, LeBron is no coaster, he exerts tons of effort, but after such an astonishing performance, I know there were people asking that.

Heading into tonight’s game 7 I have to wonder what we’ll see from LeBron. He’s now shown us he has it in him to just completely and utterly dominate a game. That also means we’re now going to expect it since we know he can do it. So tonight will we see the return of ‘the look’? Can LeBron give us those performances consistently? Or did ‘the look’ set such astronomical expectations that he can only disappoint? After all, most people have now already put the Heat in the Finals against the Thunder. We’ll see tonight. I, for one, don’t envy the position LeBron is in…

Another Update – Top 10 Coaches in NBA History

Last week I wrote a post giving my thoughts on what a revised NBA Top 50 team would look like. A less publicized distinction that was also part of the NBA’s 50 anniversary celebration was the naming of the Top 10 Coaches in NBA history. I, for one, had no idea that this award was given back in 1996. As a side note, the NBA also recognized the Top 10 Teams in league history.

But back to the Top 10 Coaches list. The men that made that list:

Red Auerbach, Chuck Daly, Bill Fitch, Red Holzman, Phil Jackson, John Kundla, Don Nelson, Jack Ramsey, Pat Riley and Lenny Wilkins

I read that list and the thought that came to mind was, “What the hell?” Bill Fitch has a career winning percentage under .500. He’s lost more games than he’s won! Don Nelson has never won an NBA title. He’s won a lot of games, but he’s also lost a lot… Same goes for Lenny Wilkins, but Lenny’s at least won an NBA title.

I initially wanted to look at this list of the top 10 coaches in league history as of 1996 and consider updating it with coaches that weren’t yet coaching in ’96. Guys like Gregg Popovich or Doc Rivers. But as I reviewed the list and thought about it more, I realized I didn’t even agree with the original list. Bill Fitch? Bill Fitch! So instead I decided to revise the list by considering coaches that were eligible to be named to that original list, coaches like Jerry Sloan and K.C. Jones, as well as new coaches that weren’t head coaches as of 1996.

Much like I did with the NBA Top 50 team, I’ll compare current coaches named as one of the Top 10 with potential new coaches that could receive the recognition. The difference with this coaching analysis is that I’ll compare all of the top 10 current coaches with those ‘new’ coaches that I think are eligible to be considered for a spot among the top 10.  The new ones I’m considering are Gregg Popovich, K.C. Jones, Jerry Sloan, Billy Cunningham, Doc Rivers, Tom Heinsohn and Larry Brown.

I decided to compare these 16 coaches against each other using wins, career winning percentage, playoff winning percentage and championships as the basis of the analysis. For coaches that were named to the original team in 1996 and were currently coaching, I’m using their updated stats through the end of the 2012 regular season.

Red Auerbach – 938 wins, .662 winning percentage, .589 playoff winning percentage, 9 NBA Championships

Larry Brown – 1,327 wins, .568 winning percentage, .511 playoff winning percentage, 1 NBA Championship

Billy Cunningham – 454 wins, .698 winning percentage, .629 playoff winning percentage, 1 NBA Championship

Chuck Daly – 638 wins, .593 winning percentage, .595 playoff winning percentage, 2 NBA Championships

Bill Fitch – 944 wins, .460 winning percentage, .505 playoff winning percentage, 1 NBA Championship

Tom Heinsohn – 427 wins, .619 winning percentage, .588 playoff winning percentage, 2 NBA Championships

Red Holzman – 696 wins, .535 winning percentage, .547 playoff winning percentage, 2 NBA Championships

Phil Jackson – 1,155 wins, .704 career winning percentage, .688 playoff winning percentage, 11 NBA Championships

K.C. Jones – 552 wins, .643 career winning percentage, .570 playoff winning percentage, 2 NBA Championships

John Kundla – 423 wins, .583 career winning percentage, .632 playoff winning percentage, 4 NBA Championships

Don Nelson – 1,335 wins, .557 career winning percentage, .452 playoff winning percentage, 0 NBA Championships

Gregg Popovich – 847 wins, .680 career winning percentage, .611 playoff winning percentage, 4 NBA Championships

Jack Ramsey – 864 wins, .525 career winning percentage, .431 playoff winning percentage, 1 NBA Championship

Pat Riley – 1,210 wins, .636 career winning percentage, .606 playoff winning percentage, 5 NBA Championships

Doc Rivers – 546 wins, .558 career winning percentage, .545 playoff winning percentage, 1 NBA Championship

Jerry Sloan – 1,221 wins, .603 career winning percentage, .485 playoff winning percentage, 0 NBA Championships

Lenny Wilkins – 1,332 wins, .536 career winning percentage, .449 playoff winning percentage, 1 NBA Championship

After comparing all these coaches, I have to say, this decision was much easier than the Top 50 players decision. I decided on the first nine pretty quickly and then it came down to Red Holzman vs. Jerry Sloan. Ultimately I decided on Jerry Sloan because he’s had such consistent success over such a long period of time.

The argument could be made that some of these coaches owe all of their success to the supreme talent they’ve had on their teams. And that argument has actually been made against coaches like Phil Jackson and Red Auerbach. I don’t buy that. There are a lot of coaches that have had a ton of talent, but haven’t been able to win consistently or an NBA Championship. It’s more difficult than it looks. Just ask Erik Spoelstra.

Anyway, the 10 coaches I think are the best in NBA history are Red Auerbach, Billy Cunningham, Chuck Daly, Tom Heinsohn, Phil Jackson, K.C. Jones, John Kundla, Gregg Popovich, Pat Riley and Jerry Sloan.

New NBA Top 50 Team

Just over fifteen years ago, David Stern announced the 50 Greatest Players in NBA History as part of the league’s fiftieth anniversary. This NBA Top 50 team was selected by a group of players, media and team representatives irrespective of position.

For some reason, over the past month I’ve been thinking about what a revised NBA Top 50 team would look like. A team that could include current players. Then a few weeks ago I read an article by Bill Simmons about Paul Pierce, in which he mentioned that Pierce would currently be considered one of the top 50 players in NBA history. So I decided to take a look at what a revised NBA Top 50 team would look like 15 years after the first team was named.

I thought about the current and recently retired players that deserve to be considered for a spot on this new NBA Top 50 team. Kobe, LeBron, Tim Duncan, Pierce, Kevin Garnett, Steve Nash, Allen Iverson, Jason Kidd, Dwyane Wade, Gary Payton and Dirk Nowitzki all came to mind.

There’s another group of players that could be in someday, but in my mind, just haven’t played long enough or made enough impact to earn a spot on the team yet. Guys like Derrick Rose, Kevin Durant, Chris Paul, Dwight Howard and Deron Williams.

So that’s eleven ‘new’ players that could be considered for the new NBA Top 50 team. Doesn’t mean all of them belong on it, but those are probably the best eleven since that initial team was named. But if any of them are going to make it on, then some players have to come off. Tougher than naming those eleven could be naming the bottom eleven off the 1996 NBA Top 50 team.

If I had to choose, I’d go with Tiny Archibald, Paul Arizin, Dave Bing, Billy Cunningham, Walt Frazier, George Gervin, Sam Jones, Jerry Lucas, Earl Monroe, Bill Walton and James Worthy.

Now let’s compare the stats of these 22 players. My thinking is that out of these 22, the top 11 get spots on the NBA Top 50 team. Keep in mind…I have a full time job…so my statistical comparison won’t match the analyses done by ESPN or SI or Bill Simmons. I just don’t have the time to get that deep into the numbers. If this was my full time job, that would be another story. You’ll see that some of the players included in this list don’t have certain stats included. That’s because those particular stats weren’t tabulated during their playing careers. For current players, the stats include their regular season numbers for the 2011-12 season:

Tiny Archibald (G): 13 seasons; 16,481 career points (18.8 ppg); 2,046 career rebounds (2.3 rpg); 6,476 career assists (7.4 apg); 719 career steals (1.1 spg); 81 career blocks (.1 bpg); 18.0 career PER

Paul Arizin (F/G): 10 seasons; 16,266 career points (22.8 ppg); 6,129 career rebounds (8.6 rpg); 1,665 career assists (2.3 apg); 19.7 career PER

Dave Bing (G): 12 seasons; 18,327 points (20.3 ppg); 3,420 career rebounds (3.8 rpg); 5,397 career assists (6.0 apg); 483 career steals (1.3 spg); 89 career blocks (.3 bpg); 17.6 career PER

Kobe Bryant (G): 16 seasons; 29,484 career points (25.4 ppg); 6,142 career rebounds (5.3 rpg); 5,418 career assists (4.7 apg); 1,722 career steals (1.5 spg); 594 career blocks (.5 bpg); 23.4 career PER

Billy Cunningham (F/C): 11 seasons; 16,310 career points (21.1 ppg); 7,981 career rebounds (10.4 rpg); 3,305 career assists (4.3 apg); 390 career steals (1.8 spg); 66 career blocks (.5 bpg); 20.0 career PER

Tim Duncan (F/C): 15 seasons; 22,558 career points (20.3 ppg); 12,533 career rebounds (11.3 rpg); 3,428 career assists (3.1 apg); 822 career steals (.7 spg); 2,469 career blocks (2.2 bpg); 24.7 career PER

Walt Frazier (G): 13 seasons; 15,581 career points (18.9 ppg); 4,830 career rebounds (5.9 rpg); 5,040 career assists (6.1 apg); 681 career steals (1.9 spg); 63 career blocks (.2 bpg); 19.1 career PER

Kevin Garnett (F): 17 seasons; 24,270 career points (19.3 ppg); 13,313 career rebounds (10.6 rpg); 5,065 career assists (4.0 apg); 1,664 career steals (1.3 spg); 1,908 career blocks (1.5 bpg); 23.3 career PER

George Gervin (G/F): 16 seasons; 26,595 career points (25.1 ppg); 5,602 career rebounds (5.3 rpg); 2,798 career assists (2.6 apg); 1,283 career steals (1.2 spg); 1,047 career blocks (1.0 bpg); 21.4 career PER

Allen Iverson (G): 14 seasons; 24,368 career points (26.7 ppg); 3,394 career rebounds (3.7 rpg); 5,624 career assists (6.2 apg); 1,983 career steals (2.2 spg); 164 career blocks (.2 bpg); 20.9 career PER

LeBron James (F/G): 9 seasons; 19,045 career points (27.6 ppg); 4,943 career rebounds (7.2 rpg); 4,751 career assists (6.9 apg); 1,194 career steals (1.7 spg); 582 career blocks (.8 bpg); 27.2 career PER

Sam Jones (G/F): 12 seasons; 15,411 career points (17.7 ppg); 4,305 career rebounds (4.9 rpg); 2,209 career assists (2.5 apg); 18.7 career PER

Jason Kidd (G): 18 seasons; 17,071 career points (13.0 ppg); 8,402 career rebounds (6.4 rpg); 11,842 career assists (9.0 apg); 2,559 career steals (1.9 spg); 425 career blocks (.3 bpg); 18.1 PER

Jerry Lucas (F/C): 11 seasons; 14,053 career points (17.0 ppg); 12,942 career rebounds (15.6 rpg); 2,732 career assists (3.3 apg); 28 career steals (.4 spg); 24 career blocks (.3 bpg); 18.9 career PER

Earl Monroe (G): 13 seasons; 17,454 career points (18.8 ppg); 2,796 career rebounds (3.0 rpg); 3.594 career assists (3.9 apg); 473 career steals (1.0 spg); 121 career blocks (.3 bpg); 17.2 career PER

Steve Nash (G): 16 seasons; 16,649 career points (14.5 ppg); 3,471 career rebounds (3.0 rpg); 9,916 career assists (8.6 apg); 862 career steals (.7 spg); 95 career blocks (.1 bpg); 20.2 career PER

Dirk Nowitzki (F): 14 seasons; 24,134 career points (22.9 ppg); 8,734 career rebounds (8.3 rpg); 2,791 career assists (2.6 apg); 926 career steals (.9 spg); 1,013 career blocks (1.0 bpg); 23.6 career PER

Gary Payton (G): 17 seasons; 21,813 career points (16.3 ppg); 5,269 career rebounds (3.9 rpg); 8,966 career assists (6.7 apg); 2,445 career steals (1.8 spg); 285 career blocks (.2 bpg);18.9 career PER

Paul Pierce (F): 14 seasons; 22,591 career points (22.0 ppg); 6,164 career rebounds (6.0 rpg); 3,935 career assists (3.8 apg); 1,499 career steals (1.5 spg); 638 career blocks (.6 bpg); 20.7 career PER

Dwyane Wade (G): 9 seasons; 14,990 career points (25.2 ppg); 3,020 career rebounds (5.1 rpg); 3,697 career assists (6.2 apg); 1,055 career steals (1.8 spg); 611 bpg (1.0 bpg); 25.7 PER

Bill Walton (C/F): 10 seasons; 6,215 career points (13.3 ppg); 4,923 career rebounds (10.5 rpg); 1,590 career assists (3.4 apg); 380 career steals (.8 spg); 1,034 career blocks (2.2 bpg); 20.0 career PER

James Worthy (F): 12 seasons; 16,320 career points (17.6 ppg); 4,708 career rebounds (5.1 rpg); 2,791 career assists (3.0 apg); 1,041 career steals (1.1 spg); 624 career blocks (.7 bpg); 17.7 career PER

I spent quite a while studying these stats and considering various factors. The original NBA Top 50 team was chosen regardless of position, so I decided to choose the top 11 from this list in the same way. That said, it’s natural for you to want to consider similar position players. How do Bill Walton’s stats look compared to Kevin Garnett? How do Dwyane Wade and Dave Bing compare? But I didn’t do straight up position swaps. I just chose who I felt were the best 11.

So who are the best 11 in my opinion? Those that earn a spot on the team (or keep one)?: Kobe Bryant, Billy Cunningham, Tim Duncan, Walt Frazier, Kevin Garnett, LeBron James, Jason Kidd, Jerry Lucas, Dirk Nowitzki, Paul Pierce and Dwyane Wade.

Some of those were easy choices – Kobe, Duncan, LeBron. Others took a lot of thought. The last player I chose was Walt Frazier, and I chose him over Steve Nash and George Gervin. Why Jason Kidd over Steve Nash, you may ask. Although Nash has a higher career scoring average and a higher PER, Kidd seems like the more complete player. He doesn’t trail Nash by much in those two statistical categories, and he leads him in rebounds, assists, steals and blocks per game.

Jerry Lucas? He was also among the last players chosen. That rebounding average really stood out to me. Nearly 16 boards a game over a career? That’s pretty crazy for a big man. The other big guys on this list don’t come near that. Duncan average 11 and Garnett and Walton each averaged just over 10.

This isn’t a science, it’s all opinion. So what’s yours? Where did I get it right? Where did I screw it up?

No More Tinsel

I can’t do this anymore. I can’t sit here and watch a team just self destruct because they have a bunch of bozos on the team. The Los Angeles Lakers have a lot of work to do this off season and it’s not in the gym. They proved that they can compete. They also proved that they can’t close. AND they proved that Andrew Bynum still doesn’t care, Pau really is soft, and Mike Brown got the short end of the stick.

Bynum. If Andrew Bynum even had 10% of the heart, determination, motivation, whatever the damn “it” factor is, that Kobe Bryant has, he would man handle any opponent. He’s huge, lean and extremely agile. He has the ability to master Kareem’s Sky Hook and modernize it to his own. He’s one of those rare players who is the perfect blend of finess and power. But, he just doesn’t care. He reminds me of that one really smart kid you knew in college, but instead of applying himself he spent his parent’s money on pot.

So Bynum, how about you start respecting the fact that you have an opportunity of a lifetime? You play for one of the most respected franchises in the history of the NBA. Act like it. Even Vlade worked twice as hard as you did. How does that make you feel? I mean sure, you’re an NBA player and I work in a cube but I would never want to be you. Not in a million years. You embarrass the class of the sport and the team simply because you can. If you could harness your idiot power for good there would be no question that you’re the best big man in the league. But since you act like Van Wilder, a 7 year freshman, you will always be mediocre at best. Too bad you will never get traded. The Lakers have wasted too much time and money on you that they’ll never get it back. Oh well I guess us fans can hope that one day you wake up and decide to be an adult.

Pau. Well, I’m sorry bud, you’re being traded. We all know this. It’s just unfortunate because you were the Great Spanish Hope. You were for 1.5 years. You really did suck it up in that 7 Game Celtic Series two years ago. Then last year, you let your girlfriend get in your head. So we thought this year you’d be back with chip on your shoulder. No you’re just old, slow and soft. There’s no other explanation. Every year you were consistently criticized for being soft and every year you came back equally soft. So Mitch (if he’s not with Portland) will ship you off to somewhere warm for a back up point guard. Buy a house and retire.

Mike Brown. Talk about a tough spot. Filling in for Phil. But you should have never gotten the job. It belongs to Brian Shaw. Go figure. If I were you I would have never accepted the position, but that just shows I’m as smart as the rest of the country. Hey, no hard feelings. I’m sure the Lakers management will give you another shot. This next year, don’t say stupid things like “Steve Blake is our starter”.

In conclusion, I’m a die hard Laker fan and it broke my heart to see them lose last night. The series should have been 3-1 going into game 5. Stupid mistakes, immaturity, and the lack of determination is why they’re at home like me. So Lakers’ management, if you’re out there, I’m a free agent next year. I’m 6 feet tall, soft, I can make stupid comments, and act like I don’t care for the Veteran’s Minimum.

@rahulrchhabria
@thecouchletes